Long Term Care Services of Ventura County, Inc. Ombudsman Program
Skip to content


Category Archives: Articles

Drugging In The News Again

The U.S. Department of Justice held a major news conference today when it announced that AstraZeneca has agreed to pay more than a half-billion dollars to settle federal claims that it illegally marketed Seroquel to be used to drug kids and elders with dementia.

This means that U.S. DOJ has found that all three of the most commonly used antipsychotics used to drug elders with dementia — Seroquel, Risperdal and Zyprexa — are being illegally marketed for this purpose. Eli Lilly agreed to pay $1.4 billion last year to settle such charges involving Zyprexa. The U.S. DOJ filed a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson earlier this year for illegally peddling Risperdal to nursing home doctors.

Here is the DOJ press release:

Attorney General Eric Holder spoke at the press conference.

Here is his statement:

Here is a New York Times article. I’m sure there will be more news tomorrow.

The New York Times

April 26, 2010

For $520 Million, AstraZeneca Will Settle Case Over Marketing of a Drug

By DUFF WILSON

AstraZeneca has completed a deal to pay $520 million to settle federal investigations into marketing practices for its blockbuster schizophrenia drug, Seroquel. The Justice Department plans a news conference on Wednesday to disclose details of the case, according to two people close to the negotiations who were not authorized to discuss it publicly.
AstraZeneca becomes the fourth pharmaceutical giant in the last three years to admit to federal charges of illegal marketing of antipsychotic drugs, a lucrative category of medications that have quickly risen to the top of United States sales charts. Aggressive sales and promotional practices have helped expand the use of powerful new antipsychotic drugs for children and the elderly.
AstraZeneca will sign a corporate integrity agreement with the federal government over its marketing of Seroquel for unapproved uses, but will not face criminal charges, the people close to the negotiations said.

The company, based in London, has been accused of misleading doctors and patients by playing up favorable research and not adequately disclosing studies that show Seroquel increases the risk of diabetes.

AstraZeneca still faces more than 25,000 civil lawsuits filed on behalf of patients contending that the company did not disclose the drug’s risks.
The deal would make formal an agreement in principle the company reached last October with the United States attorney in Philadelphia. At that time, AstraZeneca said in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that it had set aside $520 million in respect to the investigation.
The company was facing two federal investigations and two whistle-blower lawsuits involving Seroquel sales and marketing practices. One of the investigations related to physicians who had participated in clinical trials. The other inquiry involved sales staff. Details are expected to be announced Wednesday.
As a result of aggressive marketing, Seroquel has been increasingly used for children and elderly people for indications not approved by the Food and Drug Administration. The drugs have caused rapid weight gain in children, and side effects including deaths have prompted warnings against giving the drugs to elderly patients for dementia.
Although doctors are permitted to prescribe any approved drug for off-label uses, it is illegal for drug makers to promote medications for any purpose not specifically approved by the F.D.A.
Tony Jewell, a company spokesman, declined to comment on Monday. Patricia Hartman, a spokeswoman for Michael L. Levy, the United States attorney in Philadelphia, said she would neither confirm nor deny the report. “We don’t have anything public on AstraZeneca,” Ms. Hartman said.
AstraZeneca, which reported $4.9 billion in Seroquel sales in 2009, plans to report its first-quarter financial results on Thursday.
The company will join a series of American pharmaceutical companies that have admitted to illegal marketing after federal investigations and whistle-blower filings and have signed agreements with the government to monitor and avoid such activity in the future.
In the largest such case, Pfizer paid $2.3 billion last September, including $1.3 billion in the biggest criminal fine of any type in United States history, for off-label marketing of the painkiller Bextra and other drugs. Bextra was withdrawn from the market in 2005. The Pfizer fine included $301 million for off-label marketing of its antipsychotic drug Geodon.
Eli Lilly paid $1.4 billion in January 2009 to settle investigations into illegal marketing of its antipsychotic drug Zyprexa. Lilly’s settlement included a $515 million criminal fine, which until the Pfizer case was the largest such fine ever imposed on a corporation.
In 2007, Bristol-Myers Squibb and a subsidiary paid $515 million to settle federal and state investigations into marketing of its antipsychotic drug Abilify.
The newer generation of antipsychotics has surpassed cholesterol-lowering drugs to become the nation’s top-selling category of medications, accounting for $14.6 billion of the nation’s $300 billion in drug spending last year, according to the research firm IMS Health.
Seroquel, a pill usually taken once or twice a day that sells for more than $4 each, was the fifth-best-selling drug in the United States last year, IMS said. As with other antipsychotics, much of that spending is by the federal government, through the Medicaid and Medicare programs.
AstraZeneca, with American headquarters in Wilmington, Del., has previously denied wrongdoing in the Seroquel investigations. It has paid $656 million to defend itself in court against more than 25,000 civil lawsuits, the company said in an S.E.C. filing in January. Those cases are only recently beginning to reach trial.
The company has argued that people who were found to have diabetes after taking Seroquel already had diabetes or had existing conditions that made them at high risk of the disease.
According to company e-mail unsealed in civil lawsuits, AstraZeneca “buried” – a manager’s term – a 1997 study that showed Seroquel users gained 11 pounds a year, while publicizing a study that claimed users lost weight. Company e-mail messages also refer to doing a “great smoke-and-mirrors job” on unfavorable studies.

Gardiner Harris contributed reporting.


-

Michael Connors
Advocate
California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform (CANHR)
Tel:  415/974-5171
Fax: 626/796-6256
Email: michael@canhr.org

Visit our web site at http://www.canhr.org

To help support our efforts, please visit:
http://www.canhr.org/help.html

Posted in Articles, Drugs, Federal Government, Legislation, Newspapers/Books, Nursing Home.


Brutal Abuse at Calabasas Retirement Home

A former worker is on trial on charges of abuse and torture at the upscale facility. Witnesses say Cesar Ulloa jumped on residents, body-slammed one and encouraged two to fight.

Here is a link to the online Los Angeles Times story of the same name taken from testimony.

………………………………………………………………………..
This came to me this morning from one of our volunteers.  We have been aware of this case in LA County since it occurred, but the Los Angeles Times article brings out the horrendous details.  More than ever we need strong advocacy for our seniors in long term care.

Sylvia

Sylvia Taylor-Stein

Executive Director

Long Term Care Services of Ventura County, Inc.,

Posted in Articles, Assisted Living, Newspapers/Books, On The Light Side.


Nursing Homes, Federal ratings give just part of the story

Care varies widely, so diligence needed, experts say
By Lee Bowman and Thomas Hargrove
Scripps Howard News Service


Photo by Juan Carlo, StarA statistical analysis of the federal government’s first ratings of nearly 16,000 nursing homes reveals an uneven level of quality across the nation and shows how complicated it is to find a good nursing home. The Scripps Howard analysis of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ Nursing Home Compare system shows that:

• Institutions run by for-profit corporations, which account for about two-thirds of all nursing facilities, generally get lower scores than those run by nonprofits.

• Homes with more nursing staff members per patient, which also tend to be run by nonprofits, generally do better in the ratings.

• Homes with more than 100 beds tend to get lower scores in all categories, including health of residents and levels of nursing care.

• Ratings are lowest in Southern states, particularly for nursing care and registered-nurse staffing, and highest for homes in the Northeast.

• Slightly more than 20 percent of nursing homes nationwide have been regularly given the lowest ratings, and 12 percent to 13 percent have received the top rating.

• While more than 500,000 Americans die in nursing homes each year, more than 2 million return home after a nursing home stay of less than three months.

• The bad news for families trying to find a good nursing home for a loved one is that behind the ratings — a five-star scale — are many complicated issues that make it difficult to assess which institutions offer the best care.

“Everyone wants to have an easy way to look up homes,” said Larry Minnix, chief executive of the American Association of Homes and Services for the Aging, which represents more than 5,000 mostly nonprofit nursing homes and other long-term-care providers. “The concept is a good idea, but they’re not really measuring the most meaningful things, like patient- and staff-satisfaction surveys, nor do the stars take into account the patient caseload.” Read More Here – Printer Friendly

I have reprinted this story from the Star showing how important it is to compare nursing homes and find the best match for yourself or a loved one.  The Long Term Care Services of Ventura County offer comprehensive information about long term care facilities through its Pre-placement Counseling Program.  – Sylvia Taylor-Stein

Posted in Articles, Budget Proposals, Federal Government, Letters of Support, Medicare and Medicaid, Nursing Home, Ventura County.


Senior Advocate: Ombudsmen Have Crucial Role In Elder Care

Thought you might like to see Betty Berry’s article about the Ombudsman Program in today’s Star.

Q: I recently visited someone in a nursing facility and noticed a poster providing contact information for the ombudsman. I don’t know what an ombudsman does and what, if any, organization is involved.

A: The program you are asking about is the Long Term Care Ombudsman Program. It is a nationwide nonprofit organization that helps ensure quality care for residents of skilled nursing and assisted-living care facilities.

The word ombudsman is derived from a Swedish word and generally means a friend from the community. The long-term-care ombudsman is a specially trained and certified individual who advocates for quality care for the elderly residents in care facilities.

In Ventura County, ombudsmen are assigned to specific facilities and are on the premises on a weekly basis. Currently the Long Term Care Ombudsman Program of Ventura County has ombudsmen in 228 facilities that are home to more than 7,000 elders.

The program derives its authority from the Older Americans Act and the staff and volunteers are certified by the California Department of Aging. To qualify, an individual must complete 36 hours of initial training, 15 hours of field service and 12 hours of continuing education annually.

The ombudsman’s chief role is to ensure that residents of long-term-care facilities are getting the services they are entitled to. The ombudsman promotes better communication among all parties serving the residents, mediates for better care, monitors conditions of care and tries to find solutions to complaints and, if necessary, bring unresolved problems to the attention of the appropriate agency.

In addition, the program offers various services to residents’ families and the community. Prior to a family placing a loved one in a care facility, the ombudsman program offers counseling. The sessions include information about types of facilities and what options are available. This service continues after placement with family support groups.

One of the most important services is investigating and resolving complaints made by either the resident or the family. The ombudsman also informs residents about residents’ rights and provides information about services available.

All services are free, confidential and available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. For information about this program, call 656-1986.

Sylvia Taylor-Stein
Executive Director
Long Term Care Services of Ventura County, Inc.,
2021 Sperry Avenue Suite 35
Ventura, CA 93003
T: 805.656.1986 ext 13

Posted in Articles, California, Ventura County.


Governor Signs AB 392 Emergency Funding Bill For Local Ombudsman

Hello Everyone,

This is wonderful news!!! Thanks to all of you who supported this emergency funding. The Bi-partisan support of this bill put it on the governor’s desk and we are deeply grateful for the team that made this happen.

On a local level I am deeply appreciative of our Board of Supervisors, Assembly Members and Senators, the Ventura Star for supporting this legislation, and all the many friends of the Ombudsman Program. I hope to write a lengthier thank you later.

I do want to get this into your hands right away. Thank you for standing with us.

Sylvia

Read the NEWS RELEASE — Governor Signs Feuer Legislation Restoring Protections For Abused and Neglected Nursing Home Residents (210)

Sylvia Taylor-Stein
Executive Director
Long Term Care Services of Ventura County, Inc.,
2021 Sperry Avenue Suite 35
Ventura, CA 93003
T: 805.656.1986 ext 13
Fax: 805.658.8540
www.ombudsmanventura.org
a 501 (c) 3 non profit organization

Posted in Articles, California, Legislation, Letters of Support, Sacramento, Ventura County.

Tagged with , .


Effects of Budget Cuts to Senior and Aging Programs

DOWNLOAD FACT SHEET
Effects of Budget Cuts to Senior and Aging Programs (318)

Attached is a fact sheet on what we know today about the impact of the State’s budget cuts on aging services. Details are limited at this point on how the cuts will play out. State contacts are saying it will be awhile until specifics are known. We will update you and the fact sheet as additional details become available. Trying to decipher the CA budget is sketchy so the stats in red on the fact sheet are on the conservative side. For example, different sources are saying there will be a third cut to SSI/SSP that will take an individual maximum down to $803 (maximum used to be $907) per month. (Imagine trying to live on $803 per month!)

NOTE: Federally funded grantees (Title III B, C, D, E, V and VII) are not impacted by the State’s budget cuts. However, the demand for these services may increase as a result of the reductions to or elimination of State funded programs.

RECEIVED FROM:
Ventura County Area Agency on Aging
“To Serve. To Guide. To Envision.”
646 County Square Drive, Suite 100
Ventura, CA 93003-9086
Phone: 805-477-7305 – Fax: 805-477-7312
E-mail: Christine.Voth@ventura.org
Website: http://aaa.countyofventura.org

Posted in Articles, Budget Proposals, California, Legislation, Letters of Support, Sacramento, VCAAA, Ventura County.


Governor’s Budget Proposals Hit Hard on Health and Human Services

The Governor’s recently released May Revise General Fund proposals include more drastic cuts to Medi-Cal, SSI/SSP, IHSS, Development Disability services, and the elimination of entire programs serving children, elders and the disabled. Included among the proposals to address a $24.3 billion deficit for FY 09-10 are:

  • IHSS: Reduce funding for In Home Supportive Services recipients by restricting services only to those recipients with a Functional Index score of 4.0 and above. According to one estimate, about 36,000 consumers out of 462,000 people would continue to receive IHSS services, because all of the domestic and housekeeping activities that allow people to remain at home would be eliminated. Each recipient is given an FI ranking in each of 11 activities of daily living (ADLs). A weighted average of these rankings is calculated to determine the FI score.

Rank 4: Can perform a function, but only with substantial human assistance.

Rank 5: Cannot perform the function, with or without human assistance.

Rank 6: Paramedical Services Needed

  • Eliminate funding for the Caregiver Resource Centers, which provides free and low cost support services to caregivers and an entry point to services in every county in California.
  • Eliminate Adult Day Health Care, sending thousands of consumers to nursing homes
  • Eliminate all state funding for Community Care Licensing – the “oversight” and licensing agency for over 86,000 entities, serving over 1,446,000 consumers, including 7,879 residential care facilities for the elderly, with 168,000+ residents
  • Eliminate the Healthy Families Program, which provides health care for over 900,000 California children
  • Eliminate the Multi Purpose Senior Services (MSSP) program and Community Based Services Programs

The additional proposals would severely reduce or eliminate funding for mental health, developmental disability services, education, state parks, Cal grants, AIDS services, CALWORKS and several state-only Medi-Cal programs – and these are only a portion of the proposed cuts (summaries of the proposed cuts are available in pdf format at www.canhr.org under New Developments).

The Budget Conference Committee held a hearing on the proposed Health and Human Services cuts on May 27 and heard from numerous consumers and advocates. More hearings, not open for public comment, will be held over the next month, as the deadline for the budget is June 30. Meanwhile, state Controller John Chaing is calling on the legislators and the governor to finalize a budget agreement by June 15 to give him time to negotiate loans from Wall Street to cover the state’s operating costs.

If the intent is to turn California into a third world country – this might work. As the Sacramento Bee recently noted in an editorial, the governor’s proposed cuts “would leave California with the least support of its poor of any state in the nation and probably any government in the developed world.”

How can we provide services to the poorest of the poor; to our disabled citizens; to our elders who need care at home – without raising taxes? How can we even pretend to be a civilized state if we are not willing to be our “brothers and sisters keepers?”

While many legislators are aware of the devastating effect these cuts will have on real people, others of them have no idea and will resist increasing taxes until death. It is important to let your voice be heard.

Posted in Articles, Budget Proposals, California, Legislation, Sacramento.

Tagged with .